Research Ethics
Course code
ELEC834
Course type
Doctoral Program Lecture
Weekly Hours
2
ECTS
3
Term
HS 2019
Language
Englisch
Lecturers
Prof. Dr. Fabiola Heike Gerpott
Please note that exchange students obtain a higher number of credits in the BSc-program at WHU than listed here. For further information please contact directly the International Relations Office.
Course content
The course is divided into four sections.
Day 1: Introduction
- Many shades of grey: Case studies to sensitize participants
- Who owns an idea? The problem of (self-) plagiarism and how to avoid it
- How should (co-)authorship be determined? A discussion of concrete examples (e.g., exchanging authorship favors with colleagues, faculty members demanding authorship on a publication coming out of a dissertation)
Day 2: Open Science
- What is open science? An introduction to principles of transparent and reproducible research
- Tools for developing a reproducible research pipeline: Study design, preregistration, and data sharing
- New publishing formats: Replication studies, registered reports, and large-scale collaboration
Day 3: Ethics guidelines – Part I
- New EU data protection laws and what they mean for your research
- How to write an ethics proposal (theory & practice)
- DFG recommendations for safeguarding good scientific practice
- Going global: Are ethical standards about publishing shared globally?
Day 4: Ethics guidelines – Part II
- Team presentations
- How to write an ethics proposal (feedback session)
- Wrap-Up: Researching with Integrity
Class dates
| Date | Time |
|---|---|
| Monday, 30.09.2019 | 09:30 - 15:30 |
| Tuesday, 01.10.2019 | 09:30 - 15:30 |
| Monday, 04.11.2019 | 09:30 - 15:30 |
| Tuesday, 05.11.2019 | 09:30 - 15:30 |
Learning outcomes
Upon completing the course, you should be able to…
- Analyze and review the work of others on ethical standards
- Evaluate your own research in terms of ethics procedures
- Plan your data handling and analysis plan for studies
- Critically discuss publications policies
- Consider alternative routes in the publication process
- Conduct open and reproducible research
Literature
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013). The Mind of a Con Man. The New York Times, retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?hp&_r=0Dominus, S. (2017). When the revolution came for Amy Cuddy. The New York Times, retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/magazine/when-the-revolution-came-for-amy-cuddy.htmlAcademy of Management (2019). Ethics Video Series. Retrieved from http://aom.org/Multi-Media/Ethics-Video-Series/Ethics-Video-Series.aspx?terms=ethics%20video%20seriesFanelli, D, (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One, 4: 5, e5738. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738Kacmar, M. K. (2009). An Ethical Quiz. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 432-434. Doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330319Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3): 196-217. Doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4Martin, BR, (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 42, 1005-1014. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011Macfarlane, B. (2010). Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic enquiry. New York: Routledge.Murphy, K. R. & Aguinis, H. J (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Business Psychology, 34. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349: 6251, aac4716. Doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716Office of Research Integrity (2019). The Lab. Interactive Movie on Research Misconduct. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/THELAB
Exam
Group presentations, individual presentation, group discussion, individual class participation